How're we doing in the Stock market, May 2013

By -
Is the stock market booming? Few people agree that we're in the middle of a terrific boom. Objectively, an average holder of stock (see SPY chart below) is in a position quite similar to the peak of the dot.net boom or the housing boom.

Yet, even people with their 401(k) fully in stock funds don't feel it emotionally -- we have the same number, but none of the excitement and enthusiasm.

Leading up to the dot.com top, a lot of people were wondering if the ride would end. Yet, the feeling was different from now. Today, it feels like there really has not been that much of a ride.

Is the economy booming? I think the main reason for the lack of enthusiasm is that the economy -- in real terms -- has lagged behind the stock-market.

This chart overlays Real per-capita GDP on top of the SPY chart. Notice the year 2000. You see a pause, and then GDP started to rise far past the previous peak. Meanwhile, today per-capita real-GDP is not yet back to the last (housing-boom) peak.



Total employment tells a similar story. The employment picture is actually worse than this chart shows, because we ought to adjust it downward for the growth of population.



Are we near a peak? The chart above may beguile one into seeing a pattern where we are approaching the peak of a third hill. So, it is only fair to show a longer-term chart of the Dow, reproduced from stockcharts.com

Notice how the stock-market went sidewards between (approx.) 1964 and 1988, and yet shot up right after.

If we're due for a large correction, it is not merely from the repetition of a pattern. It is more likely to come from disappointments in corporate earnings -- as John Hussman has been arguing.

Different motivation: The dot.net boom saw shareholders excited about their companies. The housing boom saw them generally flush with credit and happy about their net worth. This time, resignation seems to be driving people into stocks: because the Fed has lowered rates to a point where nothing else pays. It's not a party: motivation by carrot has been replaced by "motivation" by stick. I may not matter though: either way, if people are driven to do something they would not otherwise do, that sets the stage for mal-investment. The dot.coms have been replaced by "high-yield" stocks.

Parties can last. I'm not calling the death of the market boom though. Consider how long it took for people to lose faith in the equality of all EU sovereign credit. At any rate, if one wants to bet on a central bank's game falling apart, the FED (and the U.S.) seems a poor target. It would all make for an interesting tale, if it wasn't my savings on the line!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Country Shares of World GDP

By -
Image
Here's a chart of world GDP, broken down by country share. ( HT: Carpe Diem ). Careful with the x-axis, it is not at all to scale! The basic idea is that India and China had large shares pre-industrial revolution, after which Europe rose. The U.S. shoots up, to over 40% of world GDP by 1950. Then, Japan begins to grow in the 1960s, and China in the 1980s. Suppose countries end up with GDPs proportionate to their populations. What would that picture look like? I've added a bar to the right, showing the break-down of world-population. Look at the U.S. squished down, with less that 400 million out of a world population of over 7,000 million. The biggest change is in the previously un-noticed 'rest of the world". If Africa, the Middle East and so on moved toward freedom, that could be the story of the century.  What if they do not? Here's a chart with a new assumption. Suppose the "rest-of-world" does not increase its relative s
Read more

von Mises on the Quantity Theory of Money

By -
Reading von Mises a while ago, I was surprised to see him speak against the Quantity theory of Money, but what he said made a lot of sense. A recent Facebook comment sent me back looking for the source, and I decided to blog a few choice quotes, because others may find it interesting. My summary of von Mises's position is as follows: The supply of money is an important factor in its value. This is the element of truth in the Quantity Theory However demand for money is the other factor. The quantity theory gives short shrift to demand for money. (One must look to individual decision-making processes and their objective context to understand the demand for money. One cannot start with the aggregate demand for money.) Even if supply were the only factor, it is wrong to assume the value of money will change in direct proportion to the change in supply It is also wrong to assume that an increase in supply of money changes all prices generally and similarly A good theory o
Read more

U.S. Economy: Federal Debt- How big is it?

By -
Image
( Updated: Dec 2012 ) Lots of numbers:  Trying to get a clear picture of U.S. government debt can be frustrating. The government owes: 60% of GDP : bonds owed to private entities , both foreign and domestic 100% of GDP : if we add bonds owed to the government-itself (e.g. Social Security "trust fund", Federal Reserve) 400%+ : if all Fed promises to social security and medicare recipients are met (they won't be) [Note: the GAO claims that adding another 2% (of payroll) to the current 13% payroll tax would keep social security funded for more than 70 years!] A snapshot: The U.S. government (officially) owes about US $16 trillion to the public, plus to the Fed, plus to the "trust funds".  The GDP of the U.S. is approximately $16 trillion. (Both these were about $15 Tr. last year.) To put this in perspective:  adding up the assets of everyone in the U.S. and subtracting liabilities, we get a "net worth" that adds up to about $ 64 trillion ($5
Read more